All of the following are methods for assessing the social validity of outcomes except?

Assessing social validity involves evaluating how meaningful and relevant the outcomes of an intervention are to the participants and other stakeholders, rather than to the researchers themselves. The primary methods for assessing social validity include gathering feedback directly from participants, seeking input from community stakeholders through surveys, and conducting interviews with program staff to understand the perceived value of the outcomes.

When researchers rate the social validity of participant outcomes, they may inadvertently introduce biases based on their own perspectives or objectives, rather than reflecting the actual values and experiences of those directly impacted by the intervention. This is why relying solely on researchers' ratings does not effectively gauge social validity, as it does not consider the views and feedback of participants and community members who are essential for establishing how well the outcomes align with their needs and expectations.

Therefore, the choice that does not align with the methods for assessing social validity is the one where researchers evaluate the outcomes, as it does not directly engage with the perspectives of the individuals for whom the interventions are designed.